Number Mason
Number Mason
Published: November 10, 2023
Sarah Cohen’s “What’s a Number?” reminded me that numbers are prominent. They consist of complex meanings behind the shroud of being a mere symbol; it represents various beings – living or non-living. As Cohen stated, numbers help paint accurate portraits of society while others do not. Unfortunately, the numerical values we occasionally see are double-edged swords, depending on how people use them. Some individuals may use numbers to fit a narrative, polarize, give an illusion, blow things out of proportion, or accidentally give wrong calculations. Furthermore, despite the negative aspects of mathematical objects, they give realizations to people that such values provide depth to particular things in society.
First and foremost, presenting
numbers must be minimal to avoid overwhelming viewers. Too many figures but
fewer texts may confuse or lead the audience to misinterpret the information. I
remember one of my past professors saying, “Percentages and mathematical
objects are useless; when you wrongfully use them, they lose meaning, and
readers may overlook and not consume other knowledge,” which I can attest to
upon reminiscing. She said that along those lines. Furthermore, I realize we
must use numbers in the media industry sparingly to avoid a wall of numerical
values. It is prominent we replace some mathematical characters for texts and
estimates or give common data people are aware of to have a sense of reference
(e.g., population size, market prices, etc.) on changes and developments. Doing
such an act allows reporters to add depth to their content and perhaps provide
the audience with something to recognize, be aware of, and appreciate when
viewing the news.
One must also remind oneself to use
numbers for substantial impact, especially when using common or involving data
such as population sizes or donation goals. However, mathematical characters
are not mere data – they have values that represent things in society. I
remember watching an informative video stating the lives lost during World War
Two, where the creator symbolizes one person for one thousand dead soldiers. I
was momentarily shocked and realized that evaluating numerical representation
matters because it gives a perspective that the numbers we may see refer to
something dire. One death is a sorrowful event, but two or more is a tragedy.
Despite the distressing data reporters may use for their news, using numbers
also gives academic or positive stories beneficial for the public. For
instance, economists or students may view reports to check up briefly on the
inflation rate in the Philippines. Also, citizens may view “good vibes” stories
when journalists report on charity events, calamity relief missions,
fundraisers for a cause, etc. As I can say, numbers indeed have their good and
bad sides.
Ultimately, reporters can use numbers
to represent various things in society. When using numbers, journalists may use
them sparingly to avoid inundating viewers and losing the essence of the
article. Furthermore, media practitioners should strive to replace mathematical
characters with familiar data, statistical value, or texts where the audience
can easily recognize numerical changes – since they now have substantial
references in the report. Considering all of what I discussed, it then struck
me that it is significant to remind oneself to give balance when using numbers
and always recognize that said arithmetic figures may represent a community, an
environment, a donation, a rate, a vote, and any other relevant particulars
that require numerical representation.
Comments
Post a Comment